Romney, Obama, or Biden? Who is MORE Charitable?
Everyone, and I really mean EVERYONE, badgered Mitt Romney into releasing his tax information and today those records were released. Not surprisingly to anyone who considers themselves Republican or Conservative, Romney’s charitable contributions totaled approximately 15% of his massive income. That’s a LOT of dough campers. In comparison, Obama contributes approximately 1% of his income to charity and that great champion of the poor – Joe Biden – contributed a total of $369. Really? That tightwad only gave $369 to charity?!?
For all the bitching Biden does about Republicans not caring for the less fortunate, he gave a total of $369. That isn’t even enough to pay the rent for 1 family. What a humanitarian!
However – you must keep in mind the differences between the Republican/Conservative and Democrat/Socialist mindsets in dealing with poverty.
Republicans and Conservatives believe that you fight poverty first by creating opportunity for people to help themselves. By creating a business friendly environment jobs are created as well. No one can make a successful enterprise of any size without the help of others. Whether those others are business partners or employees, EVERYONE needs help making a success. For those who need help getting back on their feet, private charity sponsored by private citizens are better able to fill the gaps by stretching a contributed dollar further than the government could ever dream of stretching a dollar stolen through taxation. For those who truly need long-term assistance or life long assistance due to permanent injury or illness, government has a limited place by supporting these unfortunate people with our tax dollars. We all share the burden of supporting those who truly cannot support themselves.
The Democrat/Socialist concept is to force everyone to give up an arbitrary amount of income to the government who then decides where best to send the money. Often times political allies and insiders profit while the working stiff faces the possibility of losing his job because his company is being taxed out of existence.
Socialism is shared misery. There is no prosperity in socialism or its cousin communism. The phrase spreading the wealth actually translates into spreading the misery. If everyone is equally poor, the left may finally be satisfied.
Before I end my opinions on this matter, let me remind you of what charity is. The term charity originates from the Greek “Agape” or “Love”. Charity means love. How can one “love” if that “love” is being forced? The short answer is that you can’t. Charity can only be beneficial for anyone – giver or receiver – if it is freely given. Those who receive the benefits of charity freely given are more appreciative of what they receive knowing someone else sacrificed their personal treasure for them.
We had the opportunity to stay at the Ronald MacDonald House in Cincinnati, Ohio for a short time when our daughter was born. Every day, volunteers from the community prepare meals for those who are consumed by the health of their child or children. These people don’t have to do what they are doing. They do it because they care and that means even more to these parents than they could EVER truly realize. As a parent who has benefited from this generosity I can feel safe in saying THANK YOU to all of you who volunteer at your local Ronald MacDonald House. And for all of you who volunteer elsewhere, thank you too. Someone would want you to know that. Your “Love/Agape/Charity” is truly appreciated. The love that you give is freely given and is a true gift. So thank you.



